Team-based approaches to the delivery of health services.

Write a paper of 1,200 words that discusses the team-based approaches to the delivery of health services. The focus of the paper should be one type of health care environment, such a long-term care facility.

Within your paper, be sure to do the following:

1. Present a patient case (this does not need to be detailed).

2. Describe the team that would deliver care and their individual roles.

3. Identify and describe the indicators and determinants of health that would influence or impact this case.

4. Describe the impact this team-based approach would have on management and line staff.

5. Provide an analysis of key financial and resource savings for consumers and insurance companies as they apply to this model.

6. From a leadership position, explain the advantages of using a team-based approach.

Your paper should contain the following parts:

1. Introduction

2. Body paragraphs (Possible headings include: Case Description, Health Care Delivery Team, Indicators and Determinants of Health, Financial and Resource Analysis, Team-Based Approach Advantages.)

3. Conclusion

Revise your paper using suggestions from the peer reviewer.

Use the Library to find at least two peer-reviewed sources.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines.

Rubrics

Health Care Delivery Paper  

  

1
  Unsatisfactory
  0.00%

2
  Less Than Satisfactory
  65.00%

3
  Satisfactory
  75.00%

4
  Good
  85.00%

5
  Excellent
  100.00%

 

80.0 %Content

 

20.0 %Criteria

Description of the criteria is   not outlined or outlined poorly.

Ignores or superficially   describes the criteria. Draws unwarranted or erroneous conclusions.

Surface-level description of   criteria is offered. Claims and ideas of the criteria are supported.

Description is direct,   competent, and appropriate for the criteria.

Thoroughly describes major   points of the criteria. Draws warranted, judicious, accurate conclusions.   Information and evidence are accurate and appropriate.

 

40.0 %Analysis

Analysis of the criteria is not   outlined or outlined poorly.

Ignores or superficially   evaluates the criteria. Draws unwarranted or erroneous conclusions.

Surface-level evaluation of   criteria is offered. Claims and ideas of the criteria are supported.

Analysis is direct, competent,   and appropriate for the criteria.

Thoughtfully analyzes and   evaluates major points of the criteria. Draws warranted, judicious, accurate   conclusions. Information and evidence are accurate and appropriate.

 

20.0 %Content Comprehension

Content is incomplete or omits   most of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria.

Content is incomplete or omits   some requirements stated in the assignment criteria.

Content is complete but   somewhat inaccurate and/or irrelevant.

Content is comprehensive and   accurate, and definitions are clearly stated.

Content is comprehensive,   accurate, and persuasive. Definitions are clearly stated.

 

10.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

 

10.0 %Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence   construction, word choice, etc.)

Inappropriate word choice and   lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of   audience. Writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them   inappropriately.

Some distracting   inconsistencies in language and/or word choice are present. The writer   exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.

Language is appropriate to the   targeted audience for the most part.

The writer is clearly aware of   audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience,   and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.

The writer uses a variety of   sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and   creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.

 

10.0 %Format

 

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing   (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Surface errors are pervasive   enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice   and/or sentence construction are used.

Frequent and repetitive   mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice,   sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.

Some mechanical errors or typos   are present but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence   structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

Prose is largely free of   mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence   structures and effective figures of speech are used.

Writer is clearly in command of   standard, written, academic English.

 

5.0 %Research Citations (in-text   citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and   formatting are appropriate to assignment and APA style)

No reference page is included.   No citations are used.